Andrew Sparrow 

Starmer announces resignation as prime minister and leader of the Labour party – UK politics live

The prime minister said a new leader will be in place before parliament returns in September
  
  


This is what Ed Davey, the Lib Dem leader, is saying about Keir Starmer’s resignation.

The British people are sick of being let down by an endless merry-go-round of prime ministers while nothing really changes for them.

This time must be different. It can’t just be about changing who’s in Number 10, it has to be about changing our broken politics so we can fix our country.

That means tackling the cost of living with a bold new deal with Europe, fixing social care at long last to end the NHS crisis; and giving power back to people by voting reform and giving communities more control.

Whoever becomes prime minister needs to drop the caution and complacency and show the ambition our country deserves.

Some of this sounds like an Andy Burnham endorsement. Burnham also thinks politics is not working for people in the UK, he is also promising change, he is strongly committed to voting reform and devolution and he is arguably the last Labour politician to produce a serious plan for social care reform (when he was health secretary before the 2010 election).

Burnham is also on record as saying he would like to the UK to rejoin the EU – although in recent weeks he has played down the prospect of implementing a radical EU reset.

Attorney general Lord Hermer says he does not think Starmer angry about his situation

Lord Hermer, the attorney general and one of Keir Starmer’s closest friends in politics, told Sky News that he did not think Starmer was angry about being forced to resign.

There have been reports saying that, behind the scenes, he is more bitter about events than his public comments suggest. (See 9.27am.) But, when asked if Starmer was angry about having to resign, Hermer said:

I would be, but I don’t think he is. I think he is someone who is genuinely focused on the country and doing the right thing, and you saw that on the podium today …

He is someone who has always, always put country first, and I think he made the decision that fighting on would not serve the party, would not serve, more importantly, the country.

Starmer’s speech was notable for his statement saying that he accepted that he had to go “with good grace”. (See 9.37am.) This marked a contrast from Boris Johnson, who could not really conceal his outrage at Tory MPs forcing him out “when we have such a vast mandate and when we’re actually only a handful of points behind in the polls” in his equivalent speech four years ago.

The only hint that Starmer does feel hard done by was the long passage commenting on his achievements as PM. (See 9.59am.)

Starmer’s speech was more dignified that Johnson’s, but Johnson’s contained a quote for the history books: “As we’ve seen at Westminster, the herd instinct is powerful and when the herd moves, it moves.” Starmer would almost certainly agree.

Australian PM Anthony Albanese pays tribute to Starmer saying he can be 'proud' of his contribution to UK

Anthony Albanese, the Australian PM, has issued this statement about Keir Starmer’s resignation. He said:

I consider Keir Starmer a friend and I’m thinking of him on what must be a very tough day.

Serving in public life is a tremendous privilege but politics can also be a harsh business.

When the time comes for Keir to leave Downing Street, he can be proud of the contribution he has made to the country he loves and to the Labour party that he led back to government in 2024.

I’m grateful for the opportunities we had to work together to strengthen our Aukus defence and security partnership, support the brave people of Ukraine and keep children safe from the damage that social media can do.

I wish Keir, Victoria and their children well with everything the future holds.

Zack Polanski says Burnham's recent policy talk 'not encouraging', and that as PM he 'must be bold'

Peter Walker is a senior Guardian political correspondent.

Zack Polanski, the leader of the Greens in England and Wales, has said that Starmer’s departure should be the moment for “a bold change of direction” for the nation.

He said:

We are still waiting to see which version of Andy Burnham might going to show up in Downing Street. While he has talked about a change of course, the early indications are not encouraging and suggest more of the same with better communication skills.

The time for half measures and sticking plasters is long gone - if he becomes the next PM, Burnham must be bold or he will be bust.

Jessica Elgot points out that, if Andy Burnham does become PM around 17 July (see 10.04am), Keir Starmer will attend the Nato summit – but Burnham would be in post for the UK-EU summit.

Two very big dates around this period:

- 7th July is Nato summit which Starmer looks likely to attend - and by which we need the Defence Investment Plan

- 22 July is the EU reset summit in Brussels. Will this be PM Andy Burnham?

Farage calls for general election

Ben Quinn is a Guardian political correspondent.

The Conservatives may not be arguing that having a new PM requires an election (see 7.52am) but Nigel Farage has called for an election. He claims that it is “ridiculous to pretend that Andy Burnham has any kind of meaningful mandate to lead the country.”

The Reform UK leader, who is himself licking his wounds after his party was beaten in last week’s Makerfield by-election, referred to that result in an “essay to Britain” in which he said that Burnham now presumed to be prime minister “based on less than 25,000 votes”.

“I’m not frightened of Andy Burnham or any of the other Labour Party stooges,” wrote Faragm who claimed that the “uniparty” of Labour and Conservatives were frightened of Reform. He added:

That’s why they band together at every byelection to attempt to block us from victory, why they tried to cancel the local elections and why they’ll try their very hardest to hold off on a general election for as long as possible.

Andy Burnham has good reason to be afraid of us. Reform is the only party that listens to the desires of working people and offers them solutions, rather than flattery and patronisation.

How Burnham could become PM around 17 July

Jessica Elgot is the Guardian’s deputy political editor.

If there are no challengers then you can expect Andy Burnham to be prime minister on or around 17 July.

Keir Starmer said that Labour’s governing body - the national executive committee - will open nominations on 9 July and that the process will be concluded by the summer recess which is expected on 16 July.

Two members of NEC confirm to the Guardian that Burnham can be prime minister by the following day - 17 July - though it could be the following Monday when parliament is in recess.

If there is a contest, all bets are off - but Starmer said he expects that to conclude by September.

Here is video of Keir Starmer announcing his resignation.

What Starmer said about his achievements as PM

In his speech, just before he got to the passage where he announced his resignation, Keir Starmer talked about his achievements in government. Here is that passage.

And look at what we’ve achieved in just two years.

An economy that is stronger, going faster than our peers, wages rising faster than inflation in every single month since we came to power.

Investment secured, infrastructure being built, an end to austerity with the fastest fall in NHS waiting lists for 17 years, the biggest improvement in rights for workers and renters in a generation.

The biggest uplift in defence spending since the cold war.

Small boat crossings falling, asylum hotels closing, protecting young people from social media and half a million children being lifted out of poverty because of the choices that I made.

Our reputation in the world restored, with Britain once again standing up for decency, respect and the rule of law, securing trade deals, standing with Ukraine, standing up for our values and rebuilding our relationship with our allies in Europe.

Change promised by a Labour government. Change fought for by a Labour government. Change delivered by a Labour government.

In the end it was rapid and efficient, but nonetheless emotional.

The particular part of Downing Street where I was standing meant I was watching Keir Starmer directly in from of me but I could also see his cabinet and advisers - and his wife, Victoria - behind him. Many, particularly Victoria, were very obviously emotional as the soon-to-depart PM spoke.

The earlier part of the speech, where Starmer set out his achievements in office, was almost drowned out by Ode to Joy blasting from the vast speaker owned by the professional protester Steve Bray just outside the speech.

But suddenly - perhaps a kindly passer-by pulled out a lead - it went quiet. Starmer set out his plans to leave and how, and became emotional himself as he thanked his colleagues, then also Victoria and his two teenage children.

Anyone who has spoken to Starmer in private knows how much he talks about his family, and with such clear pride. They will be a comfort in the most difficult moment of his political career.

Starmer ends speech saying he will leave 'biggest job in country' to spend more time on 'most important job', as dad and husband

The end of Keir Starmer’s speech was particularly moving, and he sounded close to tears at the end.

I will also give my successor my full and unequivocal support, knowing that they will inherit a Britain that is far stronger and fairer than the one I inherited two years ago, better prepared for the challenges ahead and better able to ensure the Labour party secures a second term in office.

I want to thank all of those friends and colleagues who have been at my side for these past six years or so for their incredible commitment, service and support.

I want to thank the brilliant No 10 staff and our country’s extraordinary civil service, who dedicate their lives to public service.

And when I leave the biggest job in the country, I shall spend more time on the most important job, being the best husband I can to my fantastic wife Vic, who has been a rock by my side through good times and bad, and being the best dad I can to my beautiful children who are my pride and my joy.

Thank you very much.

Starmer says new PM to take over mid July if Burnham unopposed, or by end of August if there's election

Starmer sets out the timetable for his departure.

I will ask the national executive committee of the Labour party to set out a timetable, with nominations opening on the 9th of July and completed by the summer recess.

In the case of a contest, this will ensure a new leader is in place before parliament returns in September.

I will remain in post as prime minister until the contest is complete, and I will do everything I can to ensure an orderly handover of power.

The Commons summer recess is due to start on 16 July and so, if Andy Burnham is unopposed (as seems increasingly likely – despite Wes Streeting previously saying he would definitely stand as a candidate), he will become PM in the middle of next month.

If there is a contest, the new PM will be in post by the end of August. The Commons returns after the summer recess on 1 September.

Starmer says he accepts 'with good grace' that he is not best person to lead Labour into next election

Starmer says he accepts the decision he has to go with good grace.

The question being asked now is not who was best placed to change the Labour party, to take us into power and to begin the vital work of improving lives for millions of people. Those questions have been answered.

The question my party is asking now is whether I am best placed to lead us into the next general election.

I have heard the answer of my parliamentary party to that question, and I accept that answer with good grace.

Every decision I’ve taken has been about putting the country I love first. That is why I will resign as leader of the Labour party.

I have spoken to His Majesty the King this morning to inform him of my decision.

Updated

Starmer confirms he is resigning

Starmer confirms he is resigning. He has spoken to the king, he says.

Updated

Starmer says he proved his critics wrong

Starmer says he proved his critics wrong.

We proved those people wrong because we changed our party, ripping out the poison of antisemitism, restoring trust on the economy, defence and national security, and becoming a party that once again stood proudly with, not against, our national flag.

The hard work of change was with a singular purpose, not power for power’s sake, but to change Britain for the better, to build a fairer country with dignity and respect, where everyone is seen, everyone is valued, wealth and opportunity for all, not just the privileged few.

Updated

Starmer says becoming PM two years ago proudest moment of his life

Starmer says walking up this street two years ago was the proudest moment of his life.

A new Labour government, the first in 14 years.

A page in our country’s history turned after years of disappointment and despair, the chance to change the lives of millions of people for the better.

That’s what I came into politics for.

The journey to that point was not easy.

Six years ago, I inherited a Labour party that was politically, financially and morally bankrupt.

I was told time and time again that my party was finished, that we were consigned to history, that a majority at the general election, let alone a landslide majority, was impossible.

Keir Starmer is coming out.

There is loud applause from his staff and supporters.

He looks miserable.

From my colleague Jessica Elgot

Starmer’s closest allies outside Number 10 now - his chief of staff Jill Cuthbertson, the attorney general Richard Hermer, cabinet office minister Chris Ward, Reeves’ chief of staff Ben Nunn, international aid minister Jenny Chapman. These will be the people he listened to.

These are from Steven Swinford from the Times on the conversations that led up to Keir Starmer’s announcement.

* Exchanges with Cabinet ministers were brutal on Friday, more so than previously reported. Starmer tried to convince ministers that Burnham needed to prove himself by helping Labour win Greater Manchester mayoralty. One Cabinet minister shot back that the PM was a ‘drag on the ticket’ and made it less likely they would win. ‘No one supports you any more,’ they said

* Starmer’s reticence in standing down - despite all evidence that it is over - stems from two things. First, animus towards Burnham. He believes, with some justification, that ever since he became Labour leader the mayor of Greater Manchester has tried to undermine him at his weakest moments. He also thinks Burnham is not a ‘substantive’ politician.

* Second, his wife Victoria has argued strongly that he should fight on. One ally said her counsel in Starmer’s final decision should not be underestimated. “She has been the one urging him to fight it,” the ally said. “And she’s the one who’s with him.”

From ITV’s Paul Brand

The podium has now been wheeled out in No10. Keir Starmer is expected to make a statement imminently - within 10 mins or so.

There are now some Downing Street staff beginning to assemble at the far end of the street.

Peter Walker is a senior Guardian political correspondent, who is in Downing Street.

Outside No 10 they have just tested some speakers …

There is a sense of activity stepping up in Downing Street, with officials making sure the media are behind barriers, and otherwise dashing around. It feels like it should be soon now …

And now the lectern is out.

Updated

The BBC’s Laura Kuenssberg has posted this on social media.

All the signs are there in Number 10 that Starmer statement is not far off

Jessica Elgot is the Guardian’s deputy political editor.

A July transition is the strong preference from many of the most influential figures around Andy Burnham - if there is no other candidate in a leadership contest.

There is a fear among some of his supporters that a longer transition would leave a vacuum for Burnham’s opponents - and online agitators - to start damaging the incoming prime minister before he took power. “There are pros and cons, but we have told the country we are ready to make him prime minister and we should make good on that,” said one.

The Guardian reported in May that the main aim of Burnham’s team was to ensure he was in place to give the leader’s speech by Labour party conference in mid-September - and to give him time to make preparations for entering government.

But there are growing fears of a scenario similar to when Boris Johnson was a “lame duck” prime minister during the summer of 2022 when there was an energy crisis and no government intervention.

No 10 is gearing up for an announcement. This is from the BBC’s Henry Zeffman.

The equipment for a lectern moment is being assembled in Downing Street

This is from Tom Baldwin, Keir Starmer’s biographer, and head of communications for Ed Miliband when he was Labour leader.

We seem to be in a strange place where Keir Starmer is being told he must quit to prevent more uncertainty and chaos (by those who have caused much of it) but then stay on for a couple of months because the guy who has been desperate to take his job is not yet ready to do so…

And these are from John Slinger MP, another Labour voice supportive of the PM.

Keir Starmer has a mandate from Labour members.

He stood on a manifesto and won a mandate from the British people

His challengers haven’t even bothered to challenge him.

What is their manifesto, their prospectus for [Britain].

What would their mandate be?

[Coronations] are for Kings not PMs

Modern politics:

Consumerisation

Rights not responsibilities

Instant gratification

Rolling news over analysis

Blame culture

Toxic social media

Charisma over character

Popularity over policy

Politics = my life over life experience

Disagreeing disagreeably

Short-termism

Out-dated

If you are curious as to why the Labour party is ditching Keir Starmer as PM after less than two years in office, when he clearly isn’t a total disaster like Liz Truss, or a complete scoundrel like Boris Johnson, you should have a look at a terrific series of essays by Chris Clarke on Substack about trust in politics. Starmer is being forced out in part because of mistakes he has made, and weaknesses he has as a communicator and a leader. But he is also in part being forced out because he is operating in an environment where the public are more hostile to politicians than ever before in the modern era.

This chart illustrates this best; it shows the average net satisfaction with all the main party leaders at all points since 1977. As with much in British public life, it’s got a lot worse since Brexit.

It is worth reading the Clarke essays in full, but in essence his argument is that “low trust is the result of a context where our leaders have less agency, but are subject to more exposure and higher expectations. In particular, the intense scrutiny of the information age has caused politicians to shrink from the light.”

In a passage that chimes with what Gus O’Donnell said on the Today programme this morning about manifesto pledges (see 8.29am), Clarke says:

Sections of the population are asking our leaders for things which cannot be done without self-harm to the economy, for reasons which are extremely technical and complex to explain. Steps that the right or the left see as basic common sense – such as sending boats back or banning eight figure salaries, respectively – require almost significant extrication from the international system to be achieved. This is not to say we could not do more on wealth inequality. But it’s to say that room for manoeuvre has narrowed, forcing the main parties closer together.

Jacqui Smith, the education minister, was also on the Today programme. When Nick Robinson, the presenter, put it to her that ‘it’s over, isn’t it?’, Smith replied: “No, I think you’re getting ahead of yourself.”

Gus O'Donnell questions whether political turmoil linked to PMs being constrained by manifesto promises

Gus O’Donnell, the former cabinet secretary, was interviewed on the Today programme this morning. Asked if he was worried about Britain becoming as unstable politically as Italy used to be (see 7.11am), O’Donnell replied:

It will be our seventh [PM] in a decade.

I do think we need to think about, if we’re having a prime minister change in mid-term, what’s the problem?

And it quite possibly could be that they’re elected on a manifesto that doesn’t work given the circumstances have changed.

So we’ve had a Middle East war, we’ve had a spike in inflation. Lots of things have changed.

So, maybe, maybe, you need to think some of those things in the manifesto that were perfectly legitimate at the time may not be appropriate given the circumstances we’re in now.

Updated

All the national newspapers are splashing on the fate of Keir Starmer. The BBC has a summary including pictures of all the front pages. Two papers, the Times and the Daily Telegraph, have headlines saying Burnham wants to be PM by September.

Alex Burghart, the shadow Cabinet Office minister, was on the Today programme this morning putting the Conservative party’s case on Keir Starmer being replaced. He said having a new PM would not make much difference because the government’s problems were down to the views of Labour MPs. He said:

Constitutionally there doesn’t have to be a general election, you can change prime ministers. What matters is whether the prime minister has the support of MPs in parliament.

But I have to say that there, it’s not just Keir Starmer’s legitimacy that is being called into question, it’s Labour’s.

You can change the person at the top, but if the MPs underneath still think and vote the same way, then nothing will change.

Burghart quoted Pat McFadden’s joke about Labour MPs wanting higher taxes to fund more welfare, revealed in the Mandelson files, as evidence to support his case.

Normally, when the governing party replaces the PM with the public being consulted, opposition parties demand an election. But given that the Tories changed their leader four times when they were in power without calling an immediate election, the party cannot credibly make that argument now.

But on BBC Breakfast Burghart did say that a period of instability would be “very bad for the United Kingdom” and that “we can’t be a country that changes PM every few years” – implying that he does accept that the Tories’ record in this respect left something to be desired.

Starmer will put 'interests of British people' first in any decision he takes, says education minister Jacqui Smith

Jacqui Smith, the education minister, is doing a broadcast round this morning. Speaking to Times Radio, she said she “would have been happy for [Keir Starmer] to continue” – which sounded like a confirmation that Starmer will announce his resignation, but may just be confirmation that Smith has read the papers.

She also said:

My understanding from those I’ve spoken to who are close to the prime minister yesterday is that the prime minister has spent the weekend thinking really carefully about the future of the country, about what’s the best thing to do for the British people.

He’s also, by the way, been of course engaged in government, responding to the terrible train crash, talking to the chief executive of the East Midlands ambulance service, responding to the attack in Edinburgh.

But he always thinks carefully about the future of this country and the interests of the British people – he puts them, by the way, ahead of the interests of the party – and he will make his own decisions in the light of what obviously everybody can see is a considerable amount of pressure and turbulence.

Peter Kyle, the business secretary, also stressed that Starmer’s priority was acting in the national interest when he gave an interview to the BBC yesterday.

Libby Brooks has written about Keir Starmer’s predicament in her First Edition briefing this morning. Here it is.

And here is an excerpt.

Since then, I’ve reported on people’s anger at successive prime ministers, but none have been so viscerally disliked across the spectrum as Starmer – so I called up Polly [Toynbee], who was busy working on her column, to ask what it is about him that stirs such passion. I’ve heard it myself on the doorsteps during the recent Holyrood election campaign: welfare reforms, Gaza, Mandelson … Weren’t no clothes peg big enough. And still Starmer didn’t take us into an illegal war or party while grieving relatives were kept away from their dying loved ones during Covid lockdowns.

Is it down to that enduring criticism of Starmer’s poor storytelling, or voters’ accumulated disappointments, or simply politics in the social media age?

“I’ve tried to analyse it a bit in the column,” Polly tells me, “which is a kind of warning to Andy Burnham too, that first impressions are so important. First there was Starmer’s very dismal speech in the Downing Street garden, then Rachel Reeves’s very dismal £22m black hole …” Polly’s list goes on: freebies, the winter fuel payment, the farmers’ tax.

“They did a whole string of things behind the scenes that were really important – Great British Energy, the wealth fund – but they’re not the sort of things people notice.

“What’s interesting is that the last four prime ministers have each been the most unpopular ever,” Polly adds. “That’s extraordinary. Maybe we’re in a time of such hatred of politics, after 20 years of stagnation and disappointed expectations.”

Here are some pictures from Downing Street this morning.

Keir Starmer expected to announce exit timetable

Good morning. Tomorrow is the 10th anniversary of the referendum to leave the EU, which means that Wednesday is the 10th anniversary of the day David Cameron announced he was resigning as PM. After Cameron was forced out by the result of his own referendum, another three Tory PMs were forced out by their own MPs (Theresa May, Boris Johnson and Liz Truss) and another was forced out by the electorate (Rishi Sunak). Keir Starmer has been PM for less than two years, but he is about to become the sixth PM forced out within a decade, being replaced almost certainly by Andy Burnham.

In the past the British used to joke about Italy being a country where prime ministers kept changing all the time. These days Italy looks like a beacon of stability, and Britain has become the place never that far from another bout of political turmoil.

Starmer spent the weekend pondering his future at Chequers. He is back in London now and – although No 10 has not confirmed this – journalists are on standby for an announcement potentially this morning.

Here is our overnight story by Peter Walker and Pippa Crerar.

While a Starmer resignation looks inevitable, we don’t know whether there will be a leadership election or (more likely) an uncontested handover of power to Burnham. And we don’t know whether Starmer will propose staying on until September, or whether the handover will be accelerated. We will find out more as the day goes on.

The crucial event is not in the diary, because it has not been confirmed, but these are the timings we do have.

11.30am: Downing Street is expected to hold a lobby briefing.

2.30pm: Andy Burnham is due to take his seat in the Commons as the new MP for Makerfield.

After 3.30pm: Keir Starmer is expected to make a Commons statement about the G7 summit last week.

If you want to contact me, please post a message below the line when comments are open (between 10am and 3pm), or message me on social media. I can’t read all the messages BTL, but if you put “Andrew” in a message aimed at me, I am more likely to see it because I search for posts containing that word.

If you want to flag something up urgently, it is best to use social media. You can reach me on Bluesky at @andrewsparrowgdn.bsky.social. The Guardian has given up posting from its official accounts on X, but individual Guardian journalists are there, I still have my account, and if you message me there at @AndrewSparrow, I will see it and respond if necessary.

I find it very helpful when readers point out mistakes, even minor typos. No error is too small to correct. And I find your questions very interesting too. I can’t promise to reply to them all, but I will try to reply to as many as I can, either BTL or sometimes in the blog.

Updated

 

Leave a Comment

Required fields are marked *

*

*