It is fair to say that there are still some supporters of Sir Keir Starmer inside the government and on the Labour backbenches.

There is concern that any replacement for Starmer could be a coronation, without a proper process to elect a new Labour leader.

It comes as Home Office minister Mike Tapp said there should be a law passed meaning a new prime minister would automatically trigger a general election (see 16.52).

John Slinger, often one of the Government’s most strident defenders in the Commons, told LBC earlier it would be a “farce” for Starmer to leave and be replaced by Andy Burnham. Slinger said an intern in his office had a more rigorous appointment process than if Burnham is to become Labour leader.

Health minister Preet Kaur Gill posted on X that there was “far too much Westminster gossip and not enough focus on the people we are here to serve”. She added: “The public expect us to focus on the job we were elected to do, not indulge in endless internal noise.”

Her comments were supported by backbench MP Allison Gardner.

Her colleague Kirsteen Sullivan tweeted: “No one should be led to believe that most Labour MPs want to oust a sitting Labour PM, they don’t.”

Fellow backbencher Neil Coyle posted: “My members are livid about the prospect of an utter stitch-up & the media circus being rewarded.

“When the next leader cannot change Trump, Iran, Ukraine, Putin, Musk, broadcast editorial & algorithm bias overnight they’ll bay for his blood too. Better keep that guillotine sharp.”

Rather than enjoying the weekend before returning to parliament on Monday, some Labour MPs are spending their Sundays debating what should happen to Keir Starmer’s leadership and afterwards.

Home Office minister Mike Tapp has suggested that MPs should pass a law requiring a general election if a new prime minister takes office.

Posting on X, Tapp said: “Is it time to legislate; if a change of leader is forced by its own party then a general election must be called.

“That would stop the constant churn and focus all politicians on delivery, instead of work place politics. These endless ‘house of cards’ games would end and the country would benefit. Let’s legislate to focus minds.”

Energy minister Michael Shanks, who has been a key part of Labour’s green power platform, referred to the author Walter Bagehot who wrote on the English constitution.

Shanks replied: “We elect a parliament and whoever commands a majority within that parliament is prime minister. Let’s use parliamentary time to improve the country.”

Callum Anderson, who is a ministerial assistant in the department for Science, Innovation and Technology, followed Shanks’ comments with “Quite right, Michael”.

Labour colleague Josh Fenton-Glynne said: “Mike Tapp appears surprised that we are a parliamentary democracy!

“The last two prime ministers to win an election then lose their job at the next election were [John] Major and [Harold] Wilson – course correction midterm in response to the public is the norm not the exception.”

Nearly half of Labour’s own supporters say their party has failed to live up to expectations in government, according to polling commissioned by the National Education Union.

The survey of 800 Labour members by YouGov found that 48% thought the party has done “worse than expected” in government since the election.

The same poll - conducted before the Makerfield byelection - found that 45% supported Andy Burnham as prime minister, well ahead of Keir Starmer on 24%, Angela Rayner at 7% and Wes Streeting on 4%.

A further poll of 4,000 NEU school staff was even more hostile to Labour, with 66% saying it had performed worse than expected in government.

NEU members also rejected Bridget Phillipson’s performance as education secretary: 74% said she had performed badly, while zero percent agreed that she had done very well. Asked how the government has done on education issues, 35% of NEU members said “very badly” and 37% said “fairly badly”.

Daniel Kebede, the NEU’s general secretary, said:

Educators have lost confidence in Bridget Phillipson, and Labour members have lost confidence in the government’s direction.

The party as a whole needs a fundamental change of direction, starting with education. That means new leadership at the top of the party and new leadership in the department for education.

In other news, Police Scotland said a man was charged after a series of attacks in Edinburgh on Friday night that are being treated as potential anti-Muslim hate crimes.

Counter-terrorism officers were brought in to investigate the attacks in which five people were injured.

A 36-year-old white Scottish man was arrested on Friday.

The force added late on Saturday night: “A 36-year-old man has been charged in connection with a number of incidents which took place in Edinburgh on Friday, 19 June, 2026. A report has been submitted to the Procurator Fiscal, and the individual will appear at court in due course.” Police said there was no further threat to the public.

You can read more here:

Home Office minister Mike Tapp has retweeted the following post from the ‘Politics UK’ account on X:

NEW: A Labour source says Keir Starmer feels “betrayed”

“He gave everything to Labour, including sacrificing much of his children’s teenage years to help make the party electable. He feels deeply betrayed, especially by those he believed were loyal to him”

The Green party has named Trafford council councillor Geraldine Coggins as their candidate in the by-election for the Greater Manchester mayoralty triggered by Andy Burnham’s election as an MP for Mankerfield last week.

Coggins, a published academic, is the leader of the Green Party group on Trafford council and has promised to put “people and planet over profits”. She said:

The Green party has shown in Gorton and Denton and these last local elections that people are ready for a new kind of politics, one that puts communities, fairness and the future first. We did it in Gorton and Denton, and now we will do it across Greater Manchester.

People are feeling abandoned by Labour and want real change to deliver affordable homes, thriving local communities and a healthier environment. They are tired of being told to settle for less. This campaign will offer a positive vision for the future of Greater Manchester and show that Green leadership can deliver real change.

The Green party leader, Zack Polanski, has framed the contest as a two-party race between his party and Reform.

He is hoping to ride the momentum from the Green’s landmark victory in the Gorton and Denton by-election in February, in which Hannah Spencer, a local plumber and Green party councillor, was elected as the party’s first MP in northern England after overturning Labour’s 13,000-vote majority.

Applications to become Labour’s candidate to replace Burnham in Greater Manchester are open until 5pm on Sunday. Labour is set to announce its candidate next Friday. Reform has not announced their candidate yet but former mayoral candidate Dan Barker is most likely to be selected, according to the Manchester Mill. The mayoral election is due to take place on 30 July.

Labour backbencher, Barry Gardiner, has said he doesn’t want to see a Labour leadership contest, but that the PM should go.

Gardiner, who has been a Labour MP continuously for almost three decades, said he believes Keir Starmer should be “able to go with dignity”.

Speaking to Sky News, Gardiner said:

I think what we will see is the prime minister setting out a timescale. I want him to be able to go with dignity. I think it should not be, in any way, a contest that humiliates him.

Although I do understand why people say it would be good to have a contest so people can set out their stalls and we can be clear about exactly what Andy Burnham is offering.

Labour MP for Chesterfield, Toby Perkins, a Starmer loyalist, said it needs to be clear whether a new leader would take the party on a “radical departure” from the manifesto it was elected on two years ago.

Meanwhile, the former safeguarding minister Jess Phillips, who resigned from the government in May, said candidates should at least present their ideas to the Parliamentary Labour Party.

“I very much hope that over the next week, at least, that whilst we may not end up with a full-scale contest, that there is an opportunity to properly question, in somewhat of a public forum, what’s coming next?,” she told the BBC.

Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch has written in the Mail on Sunday that her party would never sign up to an electoral pact with Nigel Farage, the Reform UK leader.

“We are not the same, and voters are not ours to trade like football cards,” she wrote, as she claimed that Reform are in favour of a bigger state, nationalisation and “unfunded giveaways”. “Reform dress like Thatcherites but act like Corbynites,” Badenoch wrote.

“Farage may be trying to unite the right, I am trying to unite the country.” This statement jars with the reality of the Conservatives trying hard to win back some of their voters by adopting divisive Reform-like stances on issues such as immigration and asylum policy.

At national level, Badenoch, whose party has consistently trialled behind Reform in the polls, and Farage have both rejected talk that they could go into the next election with some sort of electoral pact.

A string of conservative MPs and former ministers have defected from the Tories to Reform over recent months, citing their disillusionment with the party. But their defections have led many to question how different Farage’s party is to previous Conservative administrations that he blames for huge failures in governance and policy – especially on immigration.

The Guardian’s economics editor, Heather Stewart, has written an interesting analysis piece suggesting it would be wise for Andy Burnham to set clear expectations about tax and spend if he is not to spook the bond markets in the likely event he becomes prime minister. Here is an extract from her analysis in our weekly economics viewpoint column:

Burnham’s every pronouncement – and that of whoever he picks as chancellor – will now be watched intently by the markets.

If his team are serious about nationalisation of key utilities, they may well want to borrow significantly more – something Rachel Reeves’s rules allow for, where the government gets a financial asset, such as a shareholding, in return.

The logic is that the nation’s balance sheet has barely changed, if it takes on a new liability to bondholders, but that’s matched with something that generates a financial return.

The bond markets may be wary of taking such a laid-back view, however, if a Burnham government cannot show that when it comes to day-to-day spending – pensions, benefits, public services – it has a plan to make ends meet.

Under Labour party rules, any MP who wishes to challenge to be leader needs the backing of at least 20% of the parliamentary party, or 81 MPs.

The former health secretary, Wes Streeting, has pledged to seek the top job and says he has sufficient backers, but allies of Keir Starmer and Andy Burnham are sceptical.

His candidacy will become less likely if wavering Labour backbenchers conclude that they would prefer to back a likely winner and swing behind Burnham.

Starmer’s departure will set the UK on course for a seventh prime minister in 10 years, just two years after he led Labour to a sweeping general election victory, winning a majority of 174 seats.

His premiership has been battered by controversies and U-turns, including over winter fuel payments to older people and the decision to appoint Peter Mandelson as UK ambassador to Washington.

Labour has slumped in the polls, and Starmer himself is enormously unpopular with much of the public. Reform UK has led for more than 300 consecutive national polls and many Labour MPs are increasingly convinced that without a change of leader, Nigel Farage will win the next election.

The former Conservative prime minister Rishi Sunak has given Andy Burnham some advice in a piece for the Sunday Times. As a reminder, in July 2024 Sunak lost to Keir Starmer in what was the Tory party’s worst general election defeat in its parliamentary history. Sunak, who is still the MP for Richmond and Northallerton, wrote:

Burnham must recognise that if he reaches No 10, he’ll never have more power than on his first day in the job. It is vital he has a clear and achievable plan for what he wants to do in those opening hours.

Those around Burnham will want to get him there by forcing Starmer out through ministerial resignations and the like. Burnham shouldn’t want to become PM by default, though.

I remember on the morning after Boris Johnson dropped out in October 2022, I kept suggesting to my team that we should want a contest, that it would be good for us.

They assumed that I was just emotionally preparing for another candidate getting the necessary nominations and having to go through a leadership election. But I actually meant it. Without one, your mandate is weak, and you end up being bound by commitments that aren’t your priorities.

Some commentators have said Andy Burnham is a better communicator than Keir Starmer, but have questioned how different he is on policy.

The Guardian’s policy editor, Kiran Stacey, has helpfully looked at the political projects a Burnham government would likely pursue in this useful explainer:

As he spent Sunday at Chequers considering his premiership, Keir Starmer took the time to post on social media about father’s day. He wrote on X:

Being a dad is my greatest joy.Today, I’m thinking about my dad, and the father I am to my children because of him. Happy Father’s Day.

The shadow chancellor, Mel Stride, said nothing will fundamentally change if Andy Burnham replaces Keir Starmer as prime minister because the Labour party is “addicted” to debt and borrowing – and that is something that will continue under new leadership.

On Burnham specifically, Stride told Sky News: “This is somebody who has flip-flopped all over the place. You have seen it even in this byelection itself.”

“He doesn’t apparently understand what the fiscal rules are. He said rather foolish things about the bond markets in the past. The markets are watching,” Stride said, in reference to Bunrham previously suggesting the country should be less in hock to the reaction of bond traders. The outgoing Greater Manchester mayor has since bolstered his team of economic advisers in an apparent attempt to boost his fiscal credibility.

Stride went on to say that Burnham taking over as prime minister would be “bad and in the wrong direction”. The Conservatives would like Starmer to stay as leader because of his deep unpopularity across the country, as reflected in Labour’s disastrous election results across England, Scotland and Wales in May.

Peter Kyle has been speaking to Laura Kuenssberg on her Sunday politics programme. The business secretary repeated very similar lines to the ones he gave Sky News earlier this morning, notably that Keir Starmer is taking the time this weekend to think through the “political realities” he faces “today” (compared to the last two weeks). He said Starmer will reflect on what is in the country’s best interest.

Peter Kyle said Labour should not descend into infighting in the way that the Conservatives did whenever they faced a “moment of political challenge”. The Tories were readily defeated at the 2024 election by Starmer after churning through five prime ministers in seven years, including three during 2022.

When asked if he thinks it is in the country’s interest for Keir Starmer to go, Peter Kyle tellingly dodged the question and said it was imperative for the government to continue to function despite the political turbulence. He told Sky News:

My priority when I think what my role is in putting the country first is to uphold the authority of this government to make sure we can govern through a moment of political challenge and that we are 100% focused on delivering.